基于MAPPO-RDL的多专家协同评估规则决策框架

A RULE-BASED DECISION FRAMEWORK FOR MULTI-EXPERT COLLABORATIVE EVALUATION BASED ON MAPPO

  • 摘要: 在数字化转型背景下,项目评估任务面临数据规模迅速增长与内容复杂度显著提升的挑战。RAG通过在模型生成回答前,引入外部知识库进行向量检索,但为了追求高正确率,在RAG流程设计上引入复杂分支,多层过滤、规则比对等环节,导致系统流程繁琐复杂、部署门槛高。针对上述问题,提出一种基于MAPPO的多专家协同评估规则决策框架,实现多角色评审智能体的协同决策,包括构建项目评估流程的建模与多维奖励机制,以动态优化规则选择与检索策略;设计基于注意力机制的决策层,提升模型对关键规则与知识片段的聚焦能力。实验结果表明,该方法在不同规模的规则集下均表现出稳定的收敛趋势,可视化分析进一步揭示,模型在早期与后期阶段,不同专家间逐渐形成互补且差异化的选择方向,体现出显著的语义分工与可解释性。

     

    Abstract: In the context of digital transformation, project evaluation tasks face challenges such as rapidly growing data scales and significantly increased content complexity. Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) introduces an external knowledge base for vector retrieval before generating model responses. However, to achieve high accuracy, the RAG process incorporates complex branches, multi-layer filtering, and rule matching, resulting in cumbersome workflows and high deployment barriers. To address these issues, this paper proposes a rule-based decision framework for multi-expert collaborative evaluation based on MAPPO (Multi-Agent Proximal Policy Optimization). This framework included modeling the project evaluation process and implementing a multi-dimensional reward mechanism to dynamically optimize rule selection and retrieval strategies. An attention-based decision layer was designed to enhance the model's focus on key rules and knowledge fragments. Experimental results show that the proposed method demonstrates stable convergence trends across rule sets of various scales. Visualization analyses reveal that in both early and later stages, different experts gradually develop complementary and differentiated choices, highlighting significant semantic division of labor and interpretability.

     

/

返回文章
返回